The Challenge: Lawmakers often use incentives in the tax code to promote specific energy sources. Different tax treatments provide specific benefits to coal, oil, natural gas, renewables, biofuels, energy efficiency, and nuclear power. Over the decades, laws have entrenched specific tax credits and exemptions. Some credits, initially designed to be temporary provisions to jumpstart nascent technologies, have become seemingly permanent fixtures in the tax code. Many targeted tax subsidies for various energy sources are now both costly and inefficient. Furthermore, mature, cost-competitive energy sources do not need help from the taxpayer. Yet, even if a technology is financially viable, businesses that benefit will lobby to extend the preferential treatment, and politicians, looking to promote jobs in their districts, will work to make it happen.
The Opportunity: Pro-growth, technology-neutral tax reform will incentivize more investment and innovation, creating American jobs and strengthening the U.S. economy. Competitive tax policies will empower energy companies to supply families with affordable, dependable, and clean power. Removing biases against investment and lowering rates broadly instead of trying to pick winners and losers would drive investments in newer, more efficient technologies. Reforming the research and development tax credit would spur more groundbreaking discoveries and increase opportunities for small businesses to conduct R&D.
The Solutions: To move toward a pro-growth, simplified, and technology-neutral tax code, Congress and the administration should:
- Make immediate expensing permanent and apply it to longer asset class lives and research and development (R&D).
- Reform the research and development tax credit.
- Phase out targeted energy tax credits for mature technologies. At the very least, Congress should replace targeted credits with a technology-neutral, emissions-based credit that focuses on the most efficient abatement cost.
- Explore the implementation of a reverse auction to improve the efficiency of the subsidy, which could reward the most economically viable and lowest-priced energy sources and technologies, and therefore increase clean energy generation at a lower cost to taxpayers.
- Ensure any emerging energy technology tax credit is limited.
- Maintain competitive corporate tax rates.
- The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 allowed for immediate expensing for assets with lives of 20 years or less, but this expensing begins phasing out by 20 percent from 2023 through 2026.
- Philip Rossetti of the R Street Institute found, “Prior to the tax reform, private sector E&E R&D was relatively stagnant, only increasing by 2 percent from 2012-2017. After the tax reform, E&E R&D jumped by $3.3 billion, or 11.8 percent. Private sector E&E R&D is roughly seven times as large as public sector R&D.”
- There is an assortment of 44 tax credits that benefit different energy technologies, making the tax code inefficient and subject to cronyism and dependence on preferential treatment.
- Including federal and state (national and subnational) corporate tax rates, the U.S. has the 13th highest corporate tax rate out of the 38 OECD countries.
Legislation to follow:
|Legislation||Bill Number(s)||House Sponsor||Senate Sponsor||House Cosponsor(s)||Senate Cosponsor(s)|
|American Innovation and Jobs Act||S.866||Hassan (D-NH)||Young (R-IN), Cortez Masto (D-NV), Barrasso (R-WY), Sinema (I-AZ), Tillis (R-NC), and more|
|Accelerate Long-term Investment Growth Now (ALIGN) Act||H.R.2406||Arrington (R-TX-19)||Estes (R-KS-4), Buchanan (R-FL-16), Miller (R-WV-1), Steel (R-CA-45), Hern (R-OK-1), and more|
|Build It in America Act||H.R.3938||Smith (R-MO-8)|
|Small Business Jobs Act||H.R.3937||Smith (R-MO-8)|
Read the full chapter here.